State v. Vattilano III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t has been uniformly held that [prior testimony] . . . cannot constitute a waiver of the [sefi-incrimination] privilege with respect to the same matter in a subsequent legal proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).