State v. Vasquez
Citations
- 49 Fla. 126
Syllabus
<p>1. The use of the writ of habeas corpus to test the sufficiency of the evidence upon which an information may have been based is disapproved.</p> <p>2. A statute licensing “lung testers, striking machines, weighing, chewing gum stands, automatic penny in the slot machine or any other device of a similar nature” under a constitution prohibiting lotteries will not be construed to license the operation of a machine in which the element of chance largely predominates.</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfied
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court· 1953-12-23· cited 60×
- Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-04-22· cited 50×
- State ex rel. Stillman v. MerrittSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-07-14· cited 21×
- Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. McCrorySupreme Court of Florida· 1951-01-05· cited 20×
- Kelly v. State Ex Rel. LeonardSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-10· cited 17×
- Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1917-12-07· cited 15×
- Lee v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 11×
- State v. NorthropConnecticut Superior Court· 1936-03-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.