State v. VanValkenburgh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the doctrine as an “exception to statutory limits on the time for seeking review of an agency decision” (alterations omitted)
• discussing limits on when a subsequent agency decision “reopens” a previous decision to challenge
• “Ambiguity in an NPRM may also tilt toward a finding that the issue has been reopened.”
• “When an agency invites debate on some aspects of a broad subject, ... it does not automatically reopen all related aspects including those already decided.”
• \When an agency invites debate on some aspects of a broad subject ... it does not automatically reopen all related aspects including those already decided.\
• “When an agency invites debate on some aspects of a broad subject . . . it does not automatically reopen all related aspects including those already decided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).