State v. Vang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is within the district court’s discretion to determine the need for a bail-reinstatement hearing under Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 702(f
• noting that surety had not achieved one of the purposes of bail when it failed to return absent defendant to custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-12-15· cited 4×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-09-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Shetsky
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-06-19· cited 49×
• Braith v. Fischer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-08-07· cited 34×
• State v. Liakas
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1957-11-29· cited 19×
• State v. Storkamp
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-02-20· cited 19×
• Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-10-31· cited 19×
• Almor Corp. v. County of Hennepin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-17· cited 14×
• Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-08-23· cited 14×
• State v. Due
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-08-16· cited 9×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-09-16· cited 7×