State v. Vance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing fact that police officer could not provide trial testimony concerning hearsay evidence contained in report sought to be admitted as a business record similarly proscribed introduction of hearsay evidence directly from report
• discussing fact that police officer could not provide trial testimony concerning hearsay evidence contained in report sought to be admitted as a business record similarly proscribed introduction of hearsay evidence directly from report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kreutzer
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1996-08-20· cited 114×
• Lacy v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-07-12· cited 41×
• State v. Jackson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-10-19· cited 11×
• State v. McCon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-11-16· cited 2×
• State v. Jordan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-05-09· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Koberna
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1965-12-13· cited 50×
• State v. Van Horn
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-01-12· cited 47×
• State v. Boyington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-11-29· cited 41×
• State v. Sanders
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-06-02· cited 22×
• State v. Clark
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-05-02· cited 22×
• Penn v. Hartman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-06-03· cited 18×
• Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-09-02· cited 8×
• Nelson v. Holley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-10-20· cited 6×