State v. Van Straten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to consult with him on a lesser-included offense instruction and failing to request such an instruction because the evidence did not support the instruction
• finding no error where court engaged in extensive voir dire on bias against homosexuality where crime did not involve homosexuality but pretrial publicity on the case involved AIDS and homosexuality
• rejecting defendant’s claim that counsel was ineffective for 7 No. 2021AP309-CR failing to consult with him on a lesser-included offense instruction and failing to request such an instruction because the evidence did not support the instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).