· 6/27/1991
State v. Van Sickle
Citations
- 813 P.2d 910
- 120 Idaho 99
- 1991 Ida. App. LEXIS 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a “printout [of] a test result produced by a machine” was not hearsay because the “machine [wa]s not a ‘declarant’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walters, Swanstrom, Silak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.