Skip to main content
· 6/30/1989

State v. Van Matre

Citations

  • 777 P.2d 459
  • 112 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1989 Utah LEXIS 62
  • 1989 WL 73117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \we do not preclude a due process attack based on investigatory procedures\ but declining to consider the issue because the defendant failed to raise the issue below
  • indicating that defendant is not entitled to assert lack of specific and/or written findings [under section 76-5-411] as ground for error on appeal when defendant failed to object at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Zimmerman, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.