State v. Van Horn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Expert testimony, even when uncontradicted, is not conclusive on the issue of sanity and the trier of fact may find such testimony adequately rebutted by the observations of laymen.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Damion Hayes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
  Eleventh Circuit· 2021-08-25· cited 53×
• Gryczan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-27· cited 6×
• Butler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-02· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gordon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-06· cited 90×
• Yohn v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 53×
• State v. Sherrod
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-14· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Bludworth v. Kapner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-25· cited 14×
• State v. McMahon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-26· cited 10×
• Fisher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-01· cited 9×
• McClain v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-18· cited 7×