State v. Valenzuela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that imposition of the enhanced penalties requires proof of a crime-conviction sequence and that Linam was to be applied only prospectively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Simmons
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-11-05· cited 60×
• State v. Gonzales
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-10· cited 56×
• Harry E. Linam v. M. Jerry Griffin, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary, and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
  Tenth Circuit· 1982-08-09· cited 48×
• State v. Kurley
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-09-24· cited 15×
• State v. James
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-07-23· cited 13×
• Koonsman v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-09-20· cited 10×
• Hernandez v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-08-31· cited 6×
• State v. Bejar
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-04-15· cited 3×
• Vallejos v. Marquez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-12-20· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Linam
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-01-11· cited 63×
• State v. Rogers
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-11-13· cited 21×