Skip to main content
· 6/1/2017

State v. Valencia-Guzman

Citations

  • 285 Or. App. 886
  • 395 P.3d 634
  • 2017 WL 2376521
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that federal courts apply state substantive law to state law claims heard based on supplemental jurisdiction
  • explaining that whether a class action judgment may be afforded preclusive effect against an absent class member depends, inter alia, on whether the absent class member received notice that comports with constitutional due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Hadlock, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.