Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/7/2018

State v. Valdez

Citations

2018 Ohio 1768

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Further, the prosecuting attorney's comments made during closing arguments did not affect the defendant-appellant's substantial rights. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Garey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-04

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Dehass
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
State v. Hunter
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
State v. Landrum
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
State v. Eskridge
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-07-20· cited 646×
State v. Diar
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-12-10· cited 361×
State v. Haller
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
State v. Pickens (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-12-16· cited 130×
State v. Plott
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-09· cited 73×
State v. Jackson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-01-04· cited 65×
State v. Underwood
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-21· cited 36×
State v. Liles
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-03· cited 24×
State v. Porter
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-30· cited 13×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.