State v. Valdez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lawyer-client privilege rule contains virtually identical definition of “confidential;” testimony of lawyer or client cannot be compelled unless nature of communication indicates that confidentiality not contemplated and communication not considered confidential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. Scurr
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-03-17· cited 43×
• State v. Roper
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-06-19· cited 30×
• State v. Stephens
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-10-28· cited 26×
• Richards v. Patton
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-06-25· cited 15×
• State v. Smith
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 15×
• Richard Valdez v. Harvey D. Winans, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary
  Tenth Circuit· 1984-06-26· cited 9×
• State v. Sena
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Allen v. District Court
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-02-25· cited 25×