Skip to main content
· 11/18/1991

State v. Usenia

Citations

  • 599 A.2d 1026
  • 1991 R.I. LEXIS 157
  • 1991 WL 241697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial justice could properly instruct jury to disregard argumentative narration in state’s opening statement despite having determined the statement was impermissible and prejudicial
  • prosecutor was not disqualified from the matter, as the defendant could cross-examine the police officer and other witnesses instead of the prosecutor, to elicit the same testimony
  • prosecutor was not disqualified from the matter, as the defendant could cross-examine the police officer and other witnesses instead of the prosecutor, to elicit the same testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.