Skip to main content

State v. Union

Citations

  • 469 So. 2d 840
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1118
  • 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding fifteen-month prear-rest delay and seventeen-month delay from filing of information until hearing on motion to dismiss presumptively prejudicial
  • a missing police informant, without an explanation of how the informant would be favorable and material to defendant's case, is not enough to constitute actual prejudice
  • finding a fifteen-month delay presumptively prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danahy, Lehan, Ryder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.