State v. Underwood
Citations
- 35 Wash. 558
- 77 P. 863
- 1904 Wash. LEXIS 483
Syllabus
<p>Continuance — Criminal Law — Withdrawal of Attorney Five Days Before Trial — Discretion. Where an attorney, employed to defend against a charge of murder, withdrew from the case on the fifth day before trial, and the defense was entrusted to three other attorneys, it appearing that the facts of the case were simple and readily accessible, it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny defendant’s motion for a continuance upon the affidavits of his attorneys that it would he impossible for them to properly prepare for trial in the time remaining.</p> <p>Homicide — Different Degrees — Verdict for Lesser Degree Where Evidence Showed Higher Degree. Upon a trial for murder in the first degree In having caused the death of an infant by drowning, where the main issue was whether the death was caused by drowning or by an accidental overdose of chloroform, and there was sufficient evidence to support either theory, and the jury are instructed to find the defendant not guilty if they believe the death was caused by chloroform or entertain a reasonable doubt as to the drowning, a verdict of murder in the second degree should not he set aside upon the theory that the jury must find the defendant guilty of the first degree or not at all, and accused cannot complain that he was found guilty of a lesser degree than the evidence warranted.</p> <p>Homicide — Degrees of Offense — Instructions Proper as to Lesser Degree Although Evidence Showed First Degree Only. In a prosecution for murder in the first degree by causing the death of an infant by drowning, in which there was evidence that the defendant was guilty as charged and also that the death was accidental, the contention being that he was guilty of murder in the first degree or not at all, it is not error to instruct the jury that they may find the defendant guilty in the second degree or of manslaughter, since the deliberation and premeditation necessary to constitute the first degree, under the statute, do n
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GayWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-07· cited 50×
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1978-02-09· cited 28×
- State v. MorettiWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-10· cited 23×
- State v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1916-02-02· cited 21×
- Huston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1913-03-15· cited 19×
- State v. BridghamWashington Supreme Court· 1908-11-10· cited 13×
- State v. McChesneyWashington Supreme Court· 1921-01-10· cited 10×
- Dunkin v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court· 1909-11-22· cited 9×
- McEachran v. Rothschild CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1925-07-09· cited 8×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1921-04-14· cited 8×
- Hansel v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-08-03· cited 6×
- State of Washington v. Jacob Nathaniel CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-20· cited 6×
- Bundy v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1919-08-05· cited 3×
- State v. SwaffordWashington Supreme Court· 1915-12-18· cited 3×
- Gilson v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1916-12-05· cited 3×
- State v. PicoWashington Supreme Court· 1921-07-08· cited 1×
- State v. MicheliWashington Supreme Court· 1922-11-20
- People v. GuzmánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1934-02-24
- Pueblo v. GuzmánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1934-02-24
- Smith v. Puget Sound Electric Ry.W.D. Washington· 1914-03-14
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.