State v. Underwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• purpose of Habitual Violator Act “is simple: get the chronic violator out from behind the wheel”
• Foth, C.J., concurring: “[T]he present act is ambiguous at best. It deserves legislative attention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walden
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-12-28· cited 2×
• State v. Knoff
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-02-16· cited 1×
• Attorney General Opinion No.
  Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1994-10-14

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Luginbill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-11-05· cited 52×
• Estes v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1971-06-14· cited 42×
• State v. Lohrbach
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-07-17· cited 38×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-05-08· cited 37×
• State v. Wood
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-07-16· cited 27×
• State v. Boos
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-02-19· cited 21×
• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1979-02-21· cited 21×
• Brewster v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-10· cited 21×
• State v. Osoba
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-12-02· cited 17×
• Wachholz v. Wachholz
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-12-07· cited 16×
• United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Armold
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-11-08· cited 14×
• State v. Rhoades
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-10-12· cited 7×
• Hardison v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-03-12· cited 5×
• State v. Skeen
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-03-23· cited 5×
• State v. Zook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-11-29· cited 3×