Skip to main content

State v. Umstead

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 10

Syllabus

Aggravated menacing, cross-examination recross-examination abuse of discretion blanket ban Evid.R. 611(B) reasonable limit. Appellant-defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated menacing. We found that the trial court abused its discretion in not allowing defendant's trial counsel to recross a state witness. We found that the trial court had imposed a blanket ban on recross-examination and that this was against Ohio's policy of allowing broad cross-examination.

Judges: Kilbane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.