State v. Umstead
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 10
Syllabus
Aggravated menacing, cross-examination recross-examination abuse of discretion blanket ban Evid.R. 611(B) reasonable limit. Appellant-defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated menacing. We found that the trial court abused its discretion in not allowing defendant's trial counsel to recross a state witness. We found that the trial court had imposed a blanket ban on recross-examination and that this was against Ohio's policy of allowing broad cross-examination.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. Beasley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 133×
- State v. FaulknerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-10-18· cited 36×
- United States v. Charles Richard MorrisFifth Circuit· 1973-10-18· cited 27×
- State v. BoltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-19· cited 26×
- State v. RobertsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 15×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. GouldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-05-06· cited 10×
- State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.