State v. Ulgaran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “strong likelihood of unreasonable delay from waiting for” juror who failed to appear on third day of deliberations because of child-care issues justified use of alternate juror (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “A judge need not use any particular words in instructing the jury as long as the legal concepts are properly described”
• \A judge need not use any particular words in instructing the jury as long as the legal concepts are properly described\
• “A judge need not use any particular words in instructing the jury as long as the legal concepts are properly described”
• trial at which expert testimony was proffered took place in 1997
• within discretion of judge to tailor supplemental jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).