· 11/20/2009
State v. Ulate
Citations
- 219 P.3d 841
- 42 Kan. App. 2d 971
- 2009 Kan. App. LEXIS 882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We agree with the State that Ulate’s argument is better characterized as a sequestration issue than a Sixth Amendment issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Malone, Green, Marquardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.