State v. Ueding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Soppe on the basis that its “holding was ... anchored on the peculiar and evaporating nature of a deferred judgment”
• finding no intentional destruction when stolen truck was returned to owner without dusting for fingerprints
• on appeal defendant attempted to argue that he was denied due process because the district court refused to give a spoliation instruction; because defendant did not raise the due process argument in the district court, he waived such argument on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).