State v. Tyrrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that defense counsel’s decision not to subject client to the rigors of a mental examination is not unreasonable on its face
• “Decision by counsel not to subject his client to the rigors of a [mental] examination pursuant to § 704-404 cannot be considered unreasonable on its face”
• \Decision by counsel not to subject his client to the rigors of a [mental] examination pursuant to § 704-404 cannot be considered unreasonable on its face\
• “A defendant cannot complain of an erroneous instruction which benefits him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Briones v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1993-03-31· cited 150×
• Garringer v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-01-23· cited 30×
• State v. Augustin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-17· cited 29×
• State v. Soares
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-05-08· cited 21×
• State v. Nupeiset
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-04-13· cited 18×
• Stough v. State
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 14×
• State v. Yip
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-09-23· cited 13×
• State v. Churchill
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-07-27· cited 11×
• State v. Churchill
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-06-08· cited 11×
• State v. Allen
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-12-18· cited 10×
• State v. Castro
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-06-13· cited 9×
• Rygg v. County of Maui
  D. Hawaii· 1999-12-30· cited 7×
• State v. Tierney
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-05-07· cited 6×
• State v. Rapozo
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-10-15· cited 5×
• State v. Keanaaina
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-04-13