Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/22/1979
State v. Turrentine
Citations
- 592 P.2d 1305
- 122 Ariz. 39
- 1979 Ariz. App. LEXIS 420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The jury may consider only matter that has been received in evidence . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Richmond, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-13· cited 116×
- Bottoson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-12-15· cited 50×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-03-15· cited 39×
- State v. HaddCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-09-23· cited 30×
- State v. HartfordArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-04· cited 18×
- State v. MunsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-05-29· cited 18×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-23· cited 17×
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-10· cited 17×
- State v. MekeelCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-12-05· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HoldenArizona Supreme Court· 1960-05-11· cited 48×
- State v. BoagArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-24· cited 48×
- State v. HilliardArizona Supreme Court· 1961-02-02· cited 39×
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-18· cited 19×
- Morgan v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1925-06-19· cited 5×
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-11-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.