State v. Turner
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2216
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it resentenced appellant following the reversal of his conviction for purposeful murder in State v. Turner, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2017-CA-78, 2019-Ohio-144. Contrary to appellant's claim otherwise, our prior opinion did not mandate a retrial on purposeful murder and/or the offenses that merged into purposeful murder, i.e., felony murder and felonious assault. Rather, the State had the option to either retry appellant or to simply have him resentenced for felony murder and felonious assault. The 19-month delay in resentencing was not prejudicial since appellant still had to serve 18 years to life in prison for felony murder and its attendant firearm specification. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 453×
- Ali v. StateOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-15· cited 114×
- State v. Owens (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-30· cited 56×
- State v. LynnOhio Supreme Court· 1966-02-09· cited 56×
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court· 1972-12-15· cited 54×
- State v. EadsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-09· cited 22×
- State v. CroomOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-13· cited 20×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-18· cited 19×
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11· cited 7×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 3×
- State v. BuckneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.