State v. Tunstall
Citations
- 51 Tex. 81
Syllabus
<p>1. Constitutional law—Jurisdiction of Supreme Court.—The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is restricted by section 3 of article 5 of the Constitution of 1876 to civil suits, of which the District Courts have appellate or original jurisdiction.</p> <p>2. Civil case—Criminal case.—A proceeding against an attorney or counsellor at law, charging him with fraudulent or dishonorable conduct, and having for its object to strike him from the roll of practicing attorneys, is not a civil case. It is a criminal or quasicrirninal case.</p> <p>3. Proceedings against an attorney—Appeal.—Ho appeal lies to the Supreme Court from a judgment in the District Court for the defendant, in a proceeding charging an attorney with fraudulent or dishonorable conduct.</p>
Judges: Chibe, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court· 1979-05-23· cited 400×
- State v. MasonOregon Supreme Court· 1896-02-03· cited 34×
- Houtchens v. MercerTexas Supreme Court· 1930-05-07· cited 24×
- Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-22· cited 21×
- In re BrownWyoming Supreme Court· 1884-11-01· cited 7×
- State ex rel. Murphy v. SnookWashington Supreme Court· 1914-03-26· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Greene County Bar v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1927-04-18· cited 4×
- In re WallUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida· 1882-03-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.