State v. Tunison

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 1432

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., although the trial court had a duty to record appellant-Paul Tunison's sentencing hearing, Tunison did not attempt to reconstruct the hearing pursuant to App.R. 9 and explain how he was prejudiced by the missing recording. Accordingly, we find his sole assignment of error not well-taken and affirm the April 14, 2025 judgment of the Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas.