State v. T.S.R. (In re T.S.J.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that error in jury instruction was not harmless where “th[e] evidence could support a jury’s reaching the opposite conclusion” had it been instructed correctly
• “a shift or change in the burden of proof can render the issues in two different proceedings non-identical, and thereby make collateral estoppel inappropriate.”
• erroneous instruction not harmless when “th[e] evidence could support a jury’s reaching the opposite conclusion” had it been instructed correctly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).