State v. Trotter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the proper remedy when a party fails to comply with Rule 5 is to permit the discovery or inspection, grant a continuance, or prohibit the party from introducing the undisclosed evidence, or such other order as it deems just under the circumstances
• violation of Rule 5 not reversible where no prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kennerly
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 58×
• State v. Kerr
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-23· cited 58×
• State v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 39×
• State v. Dunlap
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-02· cited 22×
• State v. Salisbury
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 17×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-02· cited 16×
• State v. Proctor
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-06· cited 5×
• Earley v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-10-19· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Schumpert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-23· cited 136×
• State v. Hudnall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-03· cited 38×
• United States v. Marenghi
  D. Maine· 1995-06-26· cited 34×
• State v. Roy
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 26×
• State v. Sinclair
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-15· cited 25×
• State v. Trotter
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-01-09· cited 6×