State v. Trost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that extradition proceedings \are `emphatically' not the appropriate time or place for entertaining defenses\
• stating that extradition proceedings “are ‘emphatically’ not the appropriate time or place for entertaining defenses”
• stating that, under the Extradition Act, courts of asylum states may only consider four issues before the fugitive is delivered up to the demanding state: “(a) whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (b
• describing the Interstate Rendition Clause as one example of a “limit[] on the sovereign powers of the States” that was “part of the Framers’ conception of national identity and Union”
• \At issue in this case are the limits imposed by federal law upon state court habeas corpus proceedings challenging an extradition warrant.\
• “At issue in this case are the limits imposed by federal law upon state court habeas corpus proceedings challenging an extradition warrant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).