Supreme Court of North Carolina· 6/17/2022
State v. Tripp
Syllabus
Whether the trial court's findings of fact in its order denying defendant's motion to suppress were supported by competent evidence whether the seizure and subsequent search of defendant was constitutional.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court· 2005-03-22· cited 937×
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 390×
- United States v. KennedyFourth Circuit· 1994-08-17· cited 352×
- Los Angeles County, California v. RetteleSupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 227×
- United States v. John F. TrulloFirst Circuit· 1987-01-13· cited 154×
- United States v. Lancelot Ward, United States of America v. Bernard Gibson, Jr., United States of America v. Kevin CoxFourth Circuit· 1999-03-22· cited 94×
- United States v. Allen J. CaggianoFirst Circuit· 1990-03-26· cited 85×
- State v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 80×
- United States v. JenningsSeventh Circuit· 2008-09-15· cited 64×
- Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-05-02· cited 55×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-21· cited 11×
- United States v. Maurice FreemanEighth Circuit· 2020-07-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.