State v. Trice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sentencing statute giving a court the authority to exercise its discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences implicitly authorized court to impose sentences that are partially consecutive and concurrent
• considering statute providing that “[a] sentence imposed by the court may be made concurrent or consecutive to any other sentence which has been previously imposed or is simultaneously imposed upon the same defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Quested
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-06-26· cited 61×
• State v. Riggs
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-01· cited 57×
• State v. Wolfgang
  Yamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-15· cited 5×
• Perez v. Persson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-02· cited 1×
• State v. Carlson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Trice
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-01-29· cited 28×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 10×