State v. Trevino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• purpose of advisory is to give motorist an opportunity to make a knowing and intelligent decision whether to submit to a test
• accused has the right to make a knowing and intelligent decision whether or not to submit to a breath test, and \[f]ailure to give a proper implied consent warning will result in the suppression of the results of the [B]reathalyzer test.\
• accused has the right to make a knowing and intelligent decision whether or not to submit to a breath test, and “[flailure to give a proper implied consent warning will result in the suppression of the results of the [B]reathalyzer test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. Department of Licensing
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 103×
• Thompson v. State Dept. of Licensing
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 102×
• State v. Templeton
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 83×
• State v. Avery
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-22· cited 19×
• STATE DEPT. OF LICENSING v. Grewal
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-22· cited 12×
• State v. Elkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-24· cited 9×
• State v. Templeton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-09· cited 8×
• State v. Kanikaynar
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-03-26· cited 6×
• State v. Elkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-04· cited 5×
• State v. Dunn
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-08-03· cited 4×
• Grewal v. Department of Licensing
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-22· cited 1×
• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2026-05-14