State v. Trafny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the double jeopardy clause protects only defendants who are subject to a “second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal . . . [or] after conviction”
• stating that time spent holding defendant on separate parole violation following formal dismissal of charges cannot be attributable to state
• stating that time spent holding defendant on separate parole violation following formal dismissal of charges cannot be attributable to state
• stating that “[a] 42-day delay does not give rise to the level of per se prejudice, nor is it presumptively prejudicial” for first-degree felony charge
• concluding that a forty-two-day delay in sentencing is not presumptively prejudicial
• accounting for and considering the purpose of each individual delay under the speedy trial analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).