State v. Townsend
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1134
Syllabus
Crim.R. 44 — right to self-representation bias Evid.R. 611 — trial court's discretion to set procedure compulsory process reversible prejudice manifest weight jury instruction — complicity R.C. 2971.01(h)(1) — sexually violent predator merger of counts. The trial court engaged in extensive dialogue with appellant on trial procedures, questioned appellant on his understanding of those procedures, informed appellant that he would be held to the same standards as that of an attorney, referred appellant to a psychiatric evaluation and accepted appellant's timely written waiver. Appellant's request to represent himself was clearly and knowingly made. The trial court did not err in granting appellant's request to represent himself. Representing himself, a portion of appellant's questions were either inappropriate or inadmissible and properly objected to the trial court did not show bias against appellant. The trial court established the procedure that standby counsel would assist appellant. It was not error, for security reasons, that appellant was not allowed at sidebar, rather standby counsel communicated appellant's wishes to the trial court at sidebar. Appellant suffered no reversible prejudice where appellant failed to properly serve proposed witnesses with a subpoena. Appellant failed to provide any authority showing that a victim is required to testify in a rape case the trier of fact can determine guilt based on circumstantial and direct evidence and the credibility of other witnesses. Sufficient evidence was shown that a second offender was involved with the sexual assault of the victim and that appellant worked in concert with the other offender. The trial court's jury instruction on complicity was proper. Appellant's offenses occurred prior to the amendment of the statute and it was error to classify appellant a sexually violent predator based on the amended statute. Appellant's offenses involved different types of sexual activity and the trial court properly r
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LykinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-12· cited 22×
- State v. StansellOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-17· cited 10×
- State v. Townsend (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 9×
- State v. ClippsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-05· cited 7×
- State v. McKinneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-17· cited 6×
- State v. StansellOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-28· cited 4×
- State v. TownsendOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-10· cited 4×
- State v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-26· cited 2×
- State v. McKenzieOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-04· cited 2×
- Townsend v. GaulOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-04· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 1,118×
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 747×
- State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court· 1976-03-31· cited 427×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 291×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 279×
- State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court· 2002-08-07· cited 257×
- United States v. John Vincent MacKovichTenth Circuit· 2000-04-25· cited 117×
- United States v. Johnaton Sampson GeorgeNinth Circuit· 1995-06-02· cited 93×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 44×
- United States v. Raymond Boyd, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1980-04-28· cited 34×
- State v. FerrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-02· cited 32×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-30· cited 15×
- State v. HawkOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-31· cited 13×
- State v. AbdullahiOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-20· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.