Supreme Court of Iowa· 1/21/1976

State v. Townsend

Citations

238 N.W.2d 351
1976 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that district court acted properly in considering the presentence investigation report because defendant left the report “unchallenged as to accuracy except in two minor particulars”
holding factual basis for an Alford plea may be determined from the minutes
holding factual basis for an Alford plea may be determined from the minutes
finding that the court could consider information in the PSI when the information was “unchallenged as to accuracy except in two minor particulars”
finding that district court acted properly in considering the presentence investigation report that contained psychiatric evaluation and recommendation defendant be placed in a semi-structured environment where the defendant did not challenge the pertinent parts of the report
finding that district court acted properly in considering the presentence investigation report that contained psychiatric evaluation and recommendation defendant be placed in a semi-structured environment where the defendant did not challenge the pertinent parts of the report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Rawlings, Moore, Rawl-Ings, Rees, Uhlenhopp, Reyn-Oldson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.