Skip to main content
· 5/29/2003

State v. Touchstone

Citations

  • 71 P.3d 536
  • 188 Or. App. 45
  • 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for entry of a judgment of conviction for a lesser-included offense where “no question concerning sufficiency of the evidence [on the lesser-included] is present”
  • remanding for entry of a judgment of conviction for a lesser-included offense where “no question concerning suf- ficiency of the evidence [on the lesser-included] is present”
  • remanding for entry of a judgment of conviction for a lesser included offense where there was no question as to the sufficiency of the evidence of that offense
  • remanding for entry of judgment of conviction for lesser-included offense under similar circumstances
  • remanding for entry of judgment of conviction on lesser-included offense is appropriate when the elements of the lesser-included offense have been alleged and there is no dispute as to the sufficiency of the evidence as to those elements
  • remanding for entry of judgment of conviction on lesser-included offense is appropriate when the elements of the lesser-included offense have been alleged and there is no dispute as to the sufficiency of the evidence as to those elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Deits, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.