· 5/29/2003
State v. Touchstone
Citations
- 71 P.3d 536
- 188 Or. App. 45
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for entry of a judgment of conviction for a lesser-included offense where “no question concerning sufficiency of the evidence [on the lesser-included] is present”
- remanding for entry of a judgment of conviction for a lesser-included offense where “no question concerning suf- ficiency of the evidence [on the lesser-included] is present”
- remanding for entry of a judgment of conviction for a lesser included offense where there was no question as to the sufficiency of the evidence of that offense
- remanding for entry of judgment of conviction for lesser-included offense under similar circumstances
- remanding for entry of judgment of conviction on lesser-included offense is appropriate when the elements of the lesser-included offense have been alleged and there is no dispute as to the sufficiency of the evidence as to those elements
- remanding for entry of judgment of conviction on lesser-included offense is appropriate when the elements of the lesser-included offense have been alleged and there is no dispute as to the sufficiency of the evidence as to those elements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Deits, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.