State v. Torrez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Statutes authorizing the infliction of more serious penalties on one who is a persistent offender do not create a new, separate, distinct, independent or substantive offense.”
• implicit repeal is not favored unless clear that two statutes are inherently inconsistent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sheaves
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-24· cited 22×
• State v. Olsen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-04-21· cited 17×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-14· cited 7×
• State v. McDonald
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-06-18· cited 7×
• State v. Paredes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-24· cited 3×
• State v. Greene
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-29· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. Albert F. Vergara
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-03-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rosenberg v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1953-06-19· cited 137×
• State v. Bly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 107×
• State v. LeMaster
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-12· cited 64×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-02-07· cited 25×
• State v. Culver
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-24· cited 13×
• State v. Allen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-07-17· cited 13×