State v. Torline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting vagueness challenge to obstruction of justice statute in part because of intent requirement
• Statute which prohibited the attempt to influence a judicial officer “with intent improperly to influence such officer” was not void for vagueness under either the United States or Kansas Constitutions
• “[0]ur [embracery] statute appears to have been designed to achieve twin goals of protecting a judicial officer in specific proceedings and to prevent a miscarriage of justice in cases which are or may be brought before such judicial officer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).