State v. Torelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 911 statements from citizens are admissible only where they fall within hearsay exception other than business record exception
• 911 telephone calls reporting erratic driving are not testimonial, citing Davis v. Washington, supra at 822
• declarant startled by erratic driver and his statements \were made in the course of an ongoing urgent situation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).