Skip to main content
· 12/29/2000

State v. Tonga

Citations

  • 95 Haw. 243
  • 20 P.3d 676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim for earlier effective date was claim of CUE in final RO decision disallowing claim
  • if relevant evidence as to a procedural defect in a RO decision was actually or constructively present within the VA system, that evidence could possibly serve as the basis for a CUE claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.