State v. Tomlinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “mere possession of a forged writing does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the possessor has knowledge of the forgery . . . .”
• “Of course, the fact that the defendant did not testify [about the circumstances under which he obtained a forged unemployment check] cannot be used against him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fraley
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-12-09· cited 12×
• State v. Harrison
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-04-01· cited 8×
• State v. Berthelot
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-09-18· cited 6×
• State v. Satchfield
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-08-14· cited 5×
• State v. Ford
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1985-08-12· cited 4×
• Quantum Supplies Inc. v. Bank of the South
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-04-11· cited 3×
• State v. Matthews
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-05-24· cited 3×
• State v. Fields
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-03-18· cited 2×
• State v. Ravenna
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-03-18· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• State v. Raymo
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-09-07· cited 214×
• State v. Goiner
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-03-01· cited 44×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-11-14· cited 12×
• State v. Tomlinson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-03-26· cited 3×