State v. Tollardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert witness in crime scene reconstruction and computer assisted design programs could use computer-generated simulation as a demonstrative exhibit after concluding that the computer- generated simulation was valid
• determining that the expert used the computer to develop an opinion based in part on computer-generated evidence
• determining that the expert used the computer to develop an opinion based in part on computer-generated evidence
• determining that the expert used the computer to develop an opinion based in part on computer-generated evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Serge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-04-25· cited 71×
• State v. Ruiz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-11-22· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. Serge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-03· cited 49×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-02-17· cited 43×
• State v. Zamora
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-04· cited 34×
• Parkhill v. Alderman-Cave Milling & Grain Co. of N.M.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-10-06· cited 30×
• Andrews v. United States Steel Corp.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-02-24· cited 18×
• State v. Vance
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-12-09· cited 10×
• People v. Douglas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-04-21· cited 4×
• Parkhill v. ADLERMAN-CAVE MILLING & GRAIN
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-12-03