Skip to main content
· 9/22/1969

State v. Tisnado

Citations

  • 458 P.2d 957
  • 105 Ariz. 23
  • 1969 Ariz. LEXIS 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing privilege in regards to information concerning confidential informants
  • defendant claimed he had possession of narcotics only because he was in the process of removing it from the premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Lockwood, Struck-Meyer, McFarland, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.