Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/27/2024

State v. Tinsley

Citations

2024 Ohio 2450

Syllabus

GSI sentence contrary to law R.C. 2929.11 factors. Judgment affirmed. Because the defendant's sentence is within the statutory range and the trial court considered the statutory factors when imposing her sentence, we cannot say that the defendant's sentence is clearly and convincingly contrary to law.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Sampson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Venes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 321×
State v. Pawlak
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
State v. Clayton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-16· cited 70×
State v. Sutton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-01· cited 57×
State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-03-15· cited 57×
State v. Bridges
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-09· cited 11×
State v. Rouse
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-28· cited 6×
State v. Sharp
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-30· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.