State v. Tindell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a remand to a different trial court for resentencing was appropriate where the court made \statements questioning the veracity\ of a witness
• explaining that a sentence must be based on the Code and not on \the judge's perception that the jury rendered an unjust verdict\
• holding a trial judge concluding mid-trial publicity will prejudice a defendant must determine whether a realistic possibility of juror exposure occurred and if so, “voir dire the jurors to determine whether any exposure has occurred”
• remanding for resentencing before a different judge because \the trial judge's personal views as to the propriety of the jury's verdict irreparably tainted the sentence he imposed on defendant\
• \the statements made by the trial judge during the sentencing hearing created an irreparable impression of bias.... We are thus compelled to remand this matter for resentencing before a different judge.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).