State v. Thronsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant could not be convicted of cocaine in his body because he did not have control over the cocaine and therefore, could not be in possession
• positive drug test could not sustain conviction for cocaine possession because defendant ceased having control of it once it entered his body
• “[A] person who has cocaine in his or her body has no control over the cocaine and therefore does not have possession.”
• trial judge reasoned that cocaine in the blood or mine could he used as circumstantial evidence that defendant had earlier possessed cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).