Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/16/2015
State v. Thornton
Citations
- 188 Wash. App. 371
- 353 P.3d 642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contention reviewable only if record contains information indicating state patrol crime lab already has defendant's DNA on file
- RCW 43.43.7541 “furthers the purpose of funding for the state DNA database and agencies that collect samples”
- defendant had not submitted DNA sample in connection with prior offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berrey, Korsmo, Lawrence, Siddoway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 443×
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court· 2010-02-18· cited 153×
- Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 122×
- Bulzomi v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-10· cited 79×
- State v. KusterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-07-11· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.