State v. Thompson

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3602

Syllabus

Conviction for possession of fentanyl was supported by the evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. In addition, Thompson's sentence was not contrary to law, he did not demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and he did not demonstrate how Crim.R. 26 would have impacted this case. Further, the cumulative error doctrine was not applicable.