Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/24/2006
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 98 Conn. App. 245
- 907 A.2d 1257
- 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fair that appellant raise all issues in main brief, otherwise appellee would not be alerted to them and have opportunity to respond to them in writing
- fair that appellant raise all issues in main brief, otherwise appellee would not be alerted to them and have opportu- nity to respond to them in writing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ArmadoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-03-23· cited 15×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-08-27· cited 7×
- State v. MyersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-11-14
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-12-06
- Cervantes v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-03-11
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-05· cited 126×
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-15· cited 121×
- Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-26· cited 69×
- Ghant v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-11-28· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.