State v. Thompson
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2926
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, App.R. 26(B)(2)(b) 90-day period to file timely application, untimely filed, failure to establish good cause for untimely filing of application, App.R. 26(B)(2)(d) – sworn statement that details how applicant was prejudiced by appellate counsel, and App.R. 26(B)(4) – ten-page limitation. The applicant has filed an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening beyond the 90-day period for filing a timely application per App.R. 26(B)(2)(b). The applicant has failed to establish good cause for the untimely filing of the application for reopening. In addition, the application for reopening exceeds the ten-page limitation established by App.R. 26(B)(4). The applicant has failed to contain a sworn statement that sets forth the basis of the claim alleging that appellate counsel's representation was deficient and the manner in which the deficiency prejudiced the outcome of the appeal as required by App.R. 26(B)(2)(d). Application for reopening is denied.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court· 1982-03-02· cited 2,744×
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2004-08-11· cited 173×
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 117×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.